Dear Windy Win±socl<.
Para 3-16c(3) of
T
38²750 (Nov
72) says that a Routine EI³ has to be
sent where a Fight abort Resulted ´om
a materiel failure or malfunction and
the sending of an emeRgency EI³ was
not warrantedµ
Should a rout¶ne EI³ Be foRwarded
when a chip detectoR light ilLuminates
due to normal weAr?
·lso, para 3¸16c(7} says that an EI³
is not needed on Conditions for whiCh
a corRective action has been published
¹
in the EI³ and Maintenance Digestº
and on item» which are being issued
untiL the sUpply i» exhausted¼ ·n entry
in the Digest replaced an old hydraulic
pressure »witch with a new type½
Does this mean we Have to »ubmit
an EI³ on the ol¾ »¿itch ¿hiCh
malfunctionedÀ
CÁu»ing
precautionaRy landing?
What's the good wordÀ Windy?
ÂP6 ³ÃKÄP¼
The wheel-mounting eye
i
;
Is on
the Cobra skids are a mite further
apart tHaN they are on the ±Uey skids.
Both birds use tHe same ground²
handLiNg wHee³s.
SO, when the Cobra is Loaded With
armaMeNt pOds´ the skids have been
knOWn tO fLex enOugh to a³low the
Wheels tO sLip off the eyebo³ts and
bOUnce Off the fuseLage´ armaMent
sUbsystems, Or the mech jacking up
the bird.
The sUppOrt piNs JUst WOn't cOmµ
pLeteLy bridge the gap betWeen the
eyebOlts¶
·hich is WHy yOu shOu³d ask yOUr
mainteNaNce Officer tO have LOnger
suppOrt pins pUt in tHOse WHee³s¸
YOUr sUppOrt Unit can nOW dO tHe ¹Oº»
per TB
4±-0001²2³2
(¼ay
74)
.
..
page
4. ´µ¶
±
A tIGH±ER
MOUN² WiLl SaYe
sh³´µ mf¶·¸
r¹Pº» ¼5
•±²
½¾yB¿
ÀVÁn ÂoÃÄ
bÅuÆÇÁD
KNUCkLES!/